Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Baker v. Clinton County

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


January 23, 2009

EDWARD C. BAKER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CLINTON COUNTY; PATRICK R. MCGILL, JUDGE; RICHARD CANTWELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY; KRISTY SPRAGUE, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY; AND DANA M. LOIACONO, EX-ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY, DEFENDANTS.

DECISION AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on January 7, 2009, by the Honorable David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 4).

Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge Homer's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 4) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that all claims against County Judge Patrick McGill are DISMISSED with prejudice; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090123

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.