SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
January 27, 2009
IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY M. SPICER, APPELLANT,
MYRCINE FOTIATHIS, RESPONDENT.
In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Lynaugh, J.), dated November 8, 2007, which, after a hearing, in effect, denied his petition and granted the mother's cross petition for custody of the parties' minor child, and awarded him visitation supervised by his sister.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
STEVEN W. FISHER, J.P., HOWARD MILLER, EDWARD D. CARNI and RUTH C. BALKIN, JJ.
(Docket No. V-11012-06)
DECISION & ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
A custody finding after a hearing is entitled to deference and will not be disturbed unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Zeis v Slater,AD3d, 2008 NY Slip Op 10012 [2d Dept 2008]; Matter of Brian S. v Stephanie P., 34 AD3d 685, 686).
Contrary to the father's contentions, there is a sound and substantial basis in the record for the Family Court's determination that the child's best interests would be served by awarding custody to the mother and awarding him visitation supervised by his sister in accordance with the order (see Matter of Panetta v Ruddy, 18 AD3d 662; Matter of Custer v Slater, 2 AD3d 1227, 1228; Matter of Bryant v Nazario, 306 AD2d 529).
FISHER, J.P., MILLER, CARNI and BALKIN, JJ., concur.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.