Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

People v. Zakrzewski

NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT


January 29, 2009

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v.
NELSON ZAKRZEWSKI, APPELLANT.

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Calendar Date: December 18, 2008

Before: Peters, J.P., Rose, Lahtinen Kane and Malone Jr., JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered June 26, 2007, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of grand larceny in the third degree and identity theft in the first degree.

In satisfaction of an eight-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to grand larceny in the third degree and identity theft in the first degree. He orally waived his right to appeal, at least with respect to the sentence, but did not execute a written waiver. In accordance with the plea agreement, defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to concurrent prison terms of 31/2 to 7 years. He now appeals.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no non-frivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Upon reviewing counsel's brief and the record, we discern at least one issue of arguable merit concerning the validity and scope of defendant's waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Lewis, 29 AD3d 1076, 1076 [2006]; People v Santalucia, 9 AD3d 740, 740 [2004]) that may affect review of other potential issues disclosed by the record. Accordingly, defense counsel's application to be relieved of his assignment is granted and defendant is entitled to have new counsel assigned to address any issues that the record may disclose (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Peters, J.P., Rose, Lahtinen, Kane and Malone Jr., JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.

20090129

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.