SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
February 3, 2009
IN THE MATTER OF EDWARD M. HARRIS, APPELLANT,
HELEN M. HARRIS, RESPONDENT.
In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Whelen, J.), dated March 5, 2008, which, after a hearing, inter alia, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, JOSEPH COVELLO and ARIEL E. BELEN, JJ.
(Docket No. O-14862-07)
DECISION & ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court's determination that the petitioner failed to establish that the respondent committed a family offense was supported by a preponderance of the admissible evidence presented at the hearing (see Family Ct Act § 812; § 832). Where, as here, the Family Court was confronted primarily with issues of credibility, its factual findings must be accorded great weight on appeal unless they were clearly unsupported by the record (see Matter of Hall v Hall, 45 AD3d 842, 843). Under these circumstances, we find no basis to disturb the Family Court's determination (see Matter of Kuckcu v Cokyuksel, 31 AD3d 554; Matter of Waaldijk-Howell v Howell, 22 AD3d 675).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
MASTRO, J.P., FLORIO, COVELLO and BELEN, JJ., concur.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.