Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

DiRienzo v. James McCullagh of New York

NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT


February 24, 2009

MICHAEL DIRIENZO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JAMES MCCULLAGH OF NEW YORK, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered October 4, 2007, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Gonzalez, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Freedman, JJ.

22344/05

The denial of defendants' summary judgment motion, which was brought prior to any discovery being conducted, was appropriate. Although defendants submitted certain documents purporting to demonstrate that they were not liable under the Labor Law for plaintiff's injuries, the documents raised a number of issues of fact concerning, inter alia, the relationship among various corporate entities and those entities' presence at the subject work site. Under the circumstances, plaintiff is entitled to discovery to resolve such outstanding questions (see e.g. Primedia Inc. v SBI USA LLC, 43 AD3d 685, 686 [2007]; see also La v New York Infirmary/Beekman Downtown Hosp., 214 AD2d 425 [1995]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

20090224

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.