Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Midalgo v. Keough

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


March 10, 2009

GABRIEL G. H. MIDALGO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SGT. KEOUGH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
GABRIEL G. H. MIDALGO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SGT. BARBERRY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
GABRIEL G. H. MIDALGO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SGT. MORSE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: David G. Larimer United States District Judge

DECISION AND ORDER

On February 5, 2009, the Court issued an order directing the parties to show cause in writing, no later than March 2, 2009, why these three cases should not be dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 41.2, based on plaintiff's failure to prosecute any of these cases. Plaintiff has not responded to the order to show cause. Accordingly, these actions are dismissed for failure to prosecute.

CONCLUSION

Each of these actions is dismissed for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41.2 of the Local Rules for the Western District of New York.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090310

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.