SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
March 27, 2009
IN THE MATTER OF DWAYNE J.R., JR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY ATTORNEY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County (Judith S. Claire, J.), entered April 9, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3. The order, inter alia, placed respondent in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of five years.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
PRESENT: MARTOCHE, J.P., CENTRA, CARNI, AND GORSKI, JJ.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating him to be a juvenile delinquent based on the finding that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 ). Family Court conducted a dispositional hearing and determined that petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent required a restrictive placement (see Family Ct Act § 353.5 ). We reject respondent's contention that the court abused its discretion in failing to order a less restrictive placement (see Matter of Christopher QQ., 40 AD3d 1183, 1184). The court properly considered the background of the 14-year-old respondent; his need for intensive psychotherapy, supervision and educational services; the particularly brutal and violent nature of the murder; the need for the protection of the community in light of the unexpected nature of respondent's actions; and the willing participation of respondent in the murder of the 18-year-old victim, whom he did not know (see § 353.5 ; Christopher QQ., 40 AD3d at 1184; Matter of Lamar J.F., 8 AD3d 1091). Inasmuch as the court determined that a restrictive placement was warranted and that respondent committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute a class A felony, the court properly ordered an initial placement in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of five years (see § 353.5  [a] [i]), and did not abuse its discretion in directing that respondent initially be confined in a secure facility for a period of 18 months (see § 353.4 [a] [ii]). We note that the court reduced the initial period of secure confinement by the period of time respondent spent in juvenile detention, which was approximately three months.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.