UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
March 28, 2009
PHILIP HECKMAN, PLAINTIFF,
TERRI MAXAMILLION, ASSISTANT SUPERVISOR; AND DONALD SAYER, CNY PSYCHIATRIC CENTER, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Scullin, Senior Judge
On February 7, 2008, Plaintiff filed his civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in this action. In that complaint, Plaintiff asserted, generally, that the CNY Psychiatric Center, where he was currently housed, had no law library in violation of his First, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights.
On April 2, 2008, Magistrate Judge Treece issued a Report Recommendation and Order, in which he concluded that, because "Plaintiff ha[d] made no allegation regarding an actual injury he suffered due to the inadequate (or non-existent) law library at the psychiatric center[,] . . . he ha[d] failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and dismissal would be appropriate." See April 2, 2008 Report Recommendation and Order at 3. However, due to Plaintiff's pro se status, Magistrate Judge Treece recommended that this Court provide Plaintiff with an opportunity to amend his complaint to cure its deficiencies. See id. at 3-4.
On April 9, 2008, Plaintiff filed objections to Magistrate Judge Treece's findings and recommendations. See Dkt. No. 5. Although not entirely clear, it appears that Plaintiff objects to Magistrate Judge Treece's characterization of him as a prisoner. See id. at ¶ 1. Rather, Plaintiff submits that he is a "civil commitee [sic] pursuant to NY MHL Artical [sic] 10 . . . [and] therefor, [sic] not subject to Prison Litagation [sic] Reform Act." See id. Furthermore, Plaintiff asserts that, if necessary, this Court should dismiss this action, without prejudice, because he is developmentally disabled and is incapable of continuing this action. See id. at ¶¶ 3-4.
After reviewing Magistrate Judge Treece's Report Recommendation and Order and Plaintiff's objections thereto, the Court hereby
ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Treece's April 2, 2008 Report Recommendation and Order is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY; and the Court further
ORDERS that, because Plaintiff acknowledges that he cannot continue with this action,
Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and the Court further
ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.