UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
March 31, 2009
HAROLD CHARLES PLAINTIFF,
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: David N. Hurd United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Plaintiff brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 9, 2009, the Honorable Gustave J. DiBianco, United States Magistrate Judge, advised, by Report-Recommendation, that defendants' motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.
Based upon a careful review of entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Accordingly, it is
1. Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED only to the extent that the complaint can be read to allege an ADA or RA claim in defendants' "individual capacities;"
2. Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED in all other respects; and
3. Defendants file and serve an Answer to the Complaint on or before April 14, 2009.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.