Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

G4 Concept Marketing, Inc. v. MasterCard International

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


April 1, 2009

G4 CONCEPT MARKETING, INC., ET AL., PLAINTIFF,
v.
MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL, (A/K/A MASTERCARD INCORPORATED) DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: David G. Larimer United States District Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, through its agent, attorney Robert Calihan of Nixon Peabody, has requested an extension within which to respond to defendant's motion to dismiss. By letter, defendant opposes the request.

Although, plaintiff could, and should, have acted in a more timely manner, I see little prejudice to defendant. No prejudice is advanced by defendant; the arguments made in opposition are essentially merits-related. The case is of relatively recent origin and plaintiff is proceeding, at this time, pro se.

I, therefore, grant plaintiff's request, in part. Plaintiff's time within which to respond to the pending motion to dismiss is extended to April 24, 2009. If the Nixon Peabody firm intends to represent plaintiff it should enter a notice of appearance as soon as possible.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Rochester, New York

20090401

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.