NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
April 2, 2009
IN RE SHANAE F., A CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN YEARS, ETC., AND RENITA M., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,
ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Lori Sattler, J.), entered on or about June 22, 2007, which, after a fact-finding hearing, found that respondent educationally neglected the subject child, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the finding of neglect vacated, and the petition dismissed.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Mazzarelli, J.P., Moskowitz, Renwick, Freedman, JJ.
Petitioner failed to establish that respondent did not exercise a minimum degree of care in supplying her 14-year-old child with adequate education (Family Ct Act § 1012[f][i][A]). The record shows that respondent sought to address the reason for the child's absences from school, which was the child's concern about a member of the school's administration, by having the child transferred to a different school (see Matter of Giancarlo P., 306 AD2d 28 ; Matter of Iesha J., 183 AD2d 573 ). Moreover, petitioner did not rebut respondent's testimony that her efforts to have the child transferred were frustrated by the school's failure to assist her in that regard (see Matter of Jessica Y., 161 AD2d 368 ).
Because we find that petitioner failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent neglected the child, we need not reach the issue of whether the child's absences from school resulted in an impairment of her physical, mental or emotional condition (Family Ct Act § 1012[f][i]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.