Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


May 11, 2009

CLIFFORD B. MEACHAM ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
KNOLLS ATOMIC POWER LABORATORY ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
JAMES R. QUINN, PHD, PLAINTIFF,
v.
KNOLLS ATOMIC POWER LABORATORY ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: David R. Homer U.S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER

A telephone conference was held with counsel for all parties on May 11, 2009. During that conference, defendants requested an order that the amount of the supersedeas bond be calculated in accordance with N.D.N.Y.L.R. 67.1(a) which limits interest to 11% of the amount of the judgment and plaintiffs requested that in light of the length of time since the entry of the judgment, the bond should include interest from the date of the judgment. The parties further requested correction of the judgment which was ordered reinstated in this Courts memorandum-decision filed May 1, 2009 (Docket No. 312) and plaintiffs requested leave to file a petition for attorneys' fees and costs. As directed during the conference, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Memorandum-Decision and Order filed May 1, 2009 (Docket No. 312) is amended to the extent that all references to the "Second Amended Judgment (Docket No. 214) shall be AMENDED to "Third Amended Judgment (Docket No. 224)";

2. The supersedeas bond which defendants are required to file pursuant to N.D.N.Y.L.R. 67.1(a) shall include, inter alia, the 11% interest referred to in that rule and plaintiffs' request for an order requiring that bond to include an additional amount for the interest on the Third Amended Judgment which has accrued since entry of that judgment is DENIED; and

3. Plaintiffs' request for permission to file an application for an award of attorneys' fees and costs incurred since the entry of the Third Amended Judgment is DENIED without prejudice to plaintiffs filing such an application within fourteen days after the return of any mandate from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on the current appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090511

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.