Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Collini, J.), imposed July 19, 2007, upon his conviction of conspiracy in the second degree (two counts) and criminal solicitation in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, the resentence being indeterminate terms of 8 to 24 years imprisonment on each count of conspiracy in the second degree and 1 to 3 years imprisonment on each count of criminal solicitation, all terms to run concurrently.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, EDWARD D. CARNI and WILLIAM E. McCARTHY, JJ.
ORDERED that the resentence is modified, on the law, by reducing the term of imprisonment imposed upon each conviction of conspiracy in the second degree from an indeterminate term of 8 to 24 years imprisonment to an indeterminate term of 5 to 15 years imprisonment; as so modified, the resentence is affirmed.
When the Supreme Court originally sentenced the defendant, it imposed a term of 5 to 15 years imprisonment on each of two counts of conspiracy in the second degree, and directed that the terms run consecutively. The defendant subsequently moved, pursuant to CPL 440.20, to set aside the sentences as violative of Penal Law § 70.25. The People conceded the illegality of the original sentences, and the Supreme Court granted the defendant's motion to set aside the sentences. The court resentenced the defendant, inter alia, to concurrent terms of 8 to 24 years imprisonment on the conspiracy counts.
A court may not alter a validly imposed sentence once it has commenced (see CPL 430.10; People v Vaughan, AD3d, 2009 NY Slip Op 02394 [2d Dept 2009]; People v Romain, 288 AD2d 242, 243). The term of 5 to 15 years imprisonment originally imposed upon each count of conspiracy in the second degree, a class B felony, was lawful (see Penal Law § 70.00[b],). The only defect in the sentence was in directing that those prison terms run consecutively. "Once that illegality was successfully challenged by the defendant in his motion pursuant to CPL 440.20, there was no other defect to rectify" (People v Romain, 288 AD2d at 243; see People v Yannicelli, 40 NY2d 598). Thus, the Supreme Court lacked any statutory or inherent authority to modify the defendant's already-commenced legal sentence by increasing the term of imprisonment imposed upon each count of conspiracy in the second degree from 5 to 15 years to 8 to 24 years.
RIVERA, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, CARNI and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...