NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
June 11, 2009
PAMELA PRYOR, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, JUDLAU CONTRACTING, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karen S. Smith, J.), entered April 11, 2008, which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly sustained as the result of a trip and fall over an exposed base plate for a sidewalk bollard, granted defendant-respondent's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Tom, J.P., Nardelli, Catterson, Renwick, Richter, JJ.
Respondent made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence that it performed no construction work at or near the area where plaintiff fell. In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The testimony of plaintiff's expert as to the cause of the accident was speculative and without support in the record, and, as such, insufficient to support a finding that respondent performed any work where plaintiff fell (see Reyes v Kimball, Div. of Kimball Intl. Mktg., 269 AD2d 156, 157 ).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.