NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
June 16, 2009
IN RE ESHINA REALTY CORP., PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
NEW YORK CITY WATER BOARD, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.
Orders, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered on or about November 8, 2007, which, in a proceeding challenging respondents' imposition of surcharges for failure to install a water meter, granted the petition to the extent of finding that petitioner's administrative challenge to the surcharges was timely interposed with respect to the surcharges imposed after February 21, 2001, i.e., within four years of the filing of petitioner's administrative complaint, and directing respondents to render a final determination on the merits of petitioner's administrative complaint with respect to such surcharges, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta, Richter, JJ.
We reject respondents' argument that a single, one-time surcharge was imposed on July, 1, 2000 that continued to accrue annually until such time as petitioner installed a water meter, and that petitioner's challenge thereto, which was not made until after July 1, 2004, is barred by a four-year administrative statute of limitations. The challenged assessments should be viewed as separate and discrete where they were separately imposed in and based on petitioner's annual water bills.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.