UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
July 21, 2009
KAREN LYNN FOLEY, PLAINTIFF,
COVIDIEN, INC.; SWD HOLDINGS, INC.; AND TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP, LP, SWD HOLDING, INC. 1 DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Glenn T. Suddaby, United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Currently pending in this personal injury action filed by Karen Lynn Foley ("Plaintiff") is Chief United States Magistrate Judge Gustave J. DiBianco's Report-Recommendation of June 29, 2009, recommending that this action be sua sponte transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). (Dkt. No. 5.) Plaintiff has filed no Objections to the Report-Recommendation. For the reasons set forth below, Magistrate Judge DiBianco's Report-Recommendation is adopted in its entirety, and this action is transferred to the Southern District of New York.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
When specific objections are made to a magistrate judge's report-recommendation, the Court makes a "de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).*fn1
When only general objections are made a magistrate judge's report-recommendation, the Court reviews the report-recommendation for clear error or manifest injustice. See Brown v. Peters, 95-CV-1641, 1997 WL 599355, at *2-3 (N.D.N.Y. Sept. 22, 1997) (Pooler, J.) [collecting cases], aff'd without opinion, 175 F.3d 1007 (2d Cir. 1999).*fn2 Similarly, when a party makes no objection to a portion of a report-recommendation, the Court reviews that portion for clear error or manifest injustice. See Batista v. Walker, 94-CV-2826, 1995 WL 453299, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 31, 1995) (Sotomayor, J.) [citations omitted]; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes: 1983 Addition [citations omitted]. After conducing the appropriate review, the Court may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
After carefully reviewing all of the papers in this action, including Magistrate Judge DiBianco's Report-Recommendation, and no Objections having been submitted to the Report-Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Report-Recommendation is well-reasoned and not clearly erroneous. As a result, the Court accepts and adopts the Report-Recommendation in its entirety, for the reasons stated therein.
ACCORDINGLY, it is
ORDERED that Magistrate Judge DiBianco's Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 5) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further
ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), the Clerk of this Court shall TRANSFER this action to the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; and it is further
ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 83.6(a) of the Local Rules of Practice for this Court, TEN (10) DAYS after the date of the filing of this Decision and Order, the Clerk of this Court shall mail to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York certified copies of this Order, the docket entries in this case, and the originals of all papers on file in this case except for this Order.
Dated: July 21, 2009 Syracuse, New York