In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of an option to purchase real property pursuant to a commercial lease, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Blydenberg, J.), entered January 31, 2008, which, upon a decision of the same court dated October 17, 2007, made after a non-jury trial, is in favor of the defendant and against them, dismissing the complaint and awarding the defendant the principal sum of $260,689 on its counterclaim.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., RANDALL T. ENG, CHERYL E. CHAMBERS and L. PRISCILLA HALL, JJ.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Where, as here, a non-jury trial is involved, this Court's power to review the evidence is as broad as that of the trial court, bearing in mind that due regard must be given to " the fact that the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses'" (Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499, quoting York Mtge. Corp. v Clotar Constr. Corp., 254 NY 128, 133-134; see Totonelly v Enos, 49 AD3d 710, 711). Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the trial court's determination dismissing the complaint and awarding judgment in favor of the defendant in the principal sum of $260,689 on the counterclaim was warranted by the facts.
The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.
RIVERA, J.P., ENG, CHAMBERS and HALL, JJ., concur.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...