Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Thompson v. Laclair

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


August 25, 2009

MILTON THOMPSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DARWIN LACLAIR, SUPERINTENDENT, A. MCKEE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER AND N. IRWIN, LIEUTENANT, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Frederick J. Scullin, Jr., S.J.

ORDER

After carefully considering the entire file in this matter, including Magistrate Judge Peebles' January 30, 2009 Report, Recommendation and Order, to which the parties have not filed any objections, the Court hereby

ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Peebles' January 30, 2009 Report, Recommendation and Order is ADOPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and the Court further

ORDERS that Plaintiff's cross-motion for leave to amend his complaint as proposed is DENIED as futile; and the Court further

ORDERS that, if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he must file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Order; and the Court further

ORDERS that, if Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within the required time frame, the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment dismissing this action without further Order of this Court for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Peebles' Report, Recommendation and Order; and the Court further

ORDERS that, if Plaintiff files an amended complaint within the required time frame, Defendants shall file a response to the amended complaint in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090825

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.