Motion by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District to strike the respondent's name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4), upon his felony conviction. The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on May 28, 2003.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., WILLIAM F. MASTRO, REINALDO E. RIVERA ROBERT A. SPOLZINO and CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, JJ.
The Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District (hereinafter the Grievance Committee) moves to strike the respondent's name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4), upon the ground that he has been disbarred based upon his conviction in the County Court, Suffolk County, for criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree pursuant to Penal Law § 220.09, a class C felony.
On January 5, 2006, the respondent pleaded guilty to the aforesaid crime before the Honorable James F.X. Doyle. The respondent admitted that at approximately 12:45 P.M. on June 8, 2005, he was proceeding westbound on the Southern State Parkway near Straight Path in the Town of Babylon when he was found to be in knowing and unlawful possession of a narcotic drug, namely 399 pills of Hydrocodone in the form of Vicodin tablets. As part of the disposition, the respondent forfeited the $54,000 in cash which was recovered in the vehicle and waived any defenses, such as agency or entrapment, as well as his right to appeal.
The respondent failed to notify the Court of his conviction pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(c).
Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4), an attorney is automatically disbarred upon his conviction of a felony and ceases to be an attorney. Having ceased to be an attorney upon his conviction, the Grievance Committee's motion to strike the respondent's name from the roll of attorneys is granted based on his disbarrment, effective January 5, 2006.
PRUDENTI, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, SPOLZINO and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(a), the respondent, Andrew Petrone, is disbarred, effective January 5, 2006, and his name is now stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b); and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent, Andrew Petrone, shall comply with this court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent, Andrew Petrone, is commanded to desist and refrain from (l) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and its is further,
ORDERED that if the respondent, Andrew Petrone, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in ...