The opinion of the court was delivered by: David E. Peebles U.S. Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff Victor Altheus DePonceau, a New York State prison inmate who is proceeding pro se and has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, commenced this action on May 26, 2009, asserting civil rights claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1.*fn1 The clerk has forwarded to me for review three letters from the plaintiff, filed on June 16, 2009, Dkt. No. 7, July 17, 2009, Dkt. No. 8, and August 26, 2009, Dkt. No. 9. In the first letter, Dkt. No. 7, plaintiff requests that the court order a criminal investigation of alleged conduct by various officials and employees of the New York Department of Correctional Services. It is well established that "a private citizen lacks a judicially cognizable interest in the prosecution or non-prosecution of another." Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619, 93 S.Ct. 1146, 1149 (1973); Peter v. Goord, 2009 WL 2180580, at * 7 (W.D.N.Y. July 22, 2009) (citing Linda R.S.). Accordingly, plaintiff's request will be denied.
With respect to the other two letters, Dkt. Nos. 8 and 10, it is unclear what relief, if any, that the plaintiff is requesting. To the extent that plaintiff's letter of July 17, 2009, Dkt. No. 8, could be construed as an attempt to supplement or amend his complaint, it is in improper form in that it fails to comply with Northern District of New York Local Rule 7.1(a)(4), which requires that such application be accompanied by a fully integrated, proposed new pleading, to supercede the plaintiff's original complaint, if granted. Although no request for relief is apparent, to the extent such a request is found in Docket No. 10, it is denied.
ORDERED, that the plaintiff's request that the court order a criminal investigation (Dkt. No. 7) is DENIED; it is further
ORDERED, that the request of plaintiff set forth in Docket No. 8 and plaintiff's request for relief, if any, set forth in Docket No. 10 are both DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED, that the clerk serve a copy of this order upon the plaintiff in ...