Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Desmarat v. Artus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


September 30, 2009

JEAN MARC DESMARAT, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DALE ARTUS, SUPERINTENDENT; LINDA TURNER, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT/PROGRAM; MICHAEL R. VINCENT, CORRECTION OFFICER; AND JOHN DOE, APPU INMATE/LAW LIBRARY CLERK, ALL OF CLINTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: David N. Hurd United States District Judge

DECISION and ORDER

Plaintiff, Jean Marc Desmarat, brought this civil rights action in September 2008, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Report-Recommendation dated September 16, 2009, the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended defendants' motion (Docket No. 17) be denied, and that defendants be directed to file a response to plaintiff's complaint. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Treece, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED;

2. The Magistrate Judge's recommendation that defendants be directed to file a response to the plaintiff's complaint is moot since an answer has been filed. (Docket No. 35).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090930

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.