NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
October 6, 2009
POLYGRAM HOLDING, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
AL CAFARO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered April 29, 2009, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, limited the scope of an EBT granted to defendant and denied defendant's motion to strike the note of issue, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Saxe, J. P., Sweeny, Acosta, Richter, JJ.
The court appropriately struck a discretionary balance in granting defendant certain additional discovery consistent with our prior discovery ruling in this matter (42 AD3d 339, 340-341), while maintaining control of its trial calendar (Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v American Home Assur. Co., 23 AD3d 190 ).
We have examined the balance of defendant's argument and find it unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.