SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
October 6, 2009
IN THE MATTER OF KEVIN JEAN HENRI PAUL MORMIN, DECEASED.
In a probate proceeding, in which a judicial settlement was sought, Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C., the current attorney for the parents of the deceased, Kevin Jean Henri Paul Mormin, appeals from a decree of the Surrogate's Court, Suffolk County (Czygier, S.), entered January 28, 2008, which directed it to pay Stephen Civardi, P.C., the former attorney for the parents of the deceased, Kevin Jean Henri Paul Mormin, 20% of the gross attorney's fees earned from the settlement of the underlying action, among other things, to recover damages for the wrongful death of Kevin Jean Henri Paul Mormin.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
STEVEN W. FISHER, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, L. PRISCILLA HALL and LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.
(File No. 500 A 2005)
DECISION & ORDER
ORDERED that the decree is affirmed, with costs payable by Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Where an attorney is discharged without cause, the attorney may recover in quantum meruit the reasonable value of the services rendered (see Campagnola v Mulholland Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 44; Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54, 60; Bruk v Albin, 270 AD2d 441, 442). "The determination of what constitutes a reasonable attorney's fee is left to the sound discretion of the surrogate, who is in a far superior position to judge those factors integral to the fixing of counsel fees, such as the time, effort, and skill required'" (Matter of Tendler, 12 AD3d 520, 521; quoting Matter of Pekofsky v Estate of Cohen, 259 AD2d 702; see Clifford v Pierce, 214 AD2d 697, 698).
Here, contrary to the appellant's contention, the Surrogate's Court providently exercised its discretion in fixing the fee of Stephen Civardi, P.C., at the sum of $58,777.82, which was 20% of the total attorney's fee (see Clifford v Pierce, 214 AD2d at 698).
The appellant's remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court.
FISHER, J.P., BALKIN, HALL and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.