Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Brickey v. Dolgencorp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


October 30, 2009

TAMMY BRICKEY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
DOLGENCORP, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: David G. Larimer United States District Judge

DECISION AND ORDER

Defendants moved for leave to file a surreply concerning a pending motion (Dkt. #168). After due consideration, the Court granted the motion (Dkt. #169). By letter dated October 28, 2009, filed that same day (Dkt. #170), plaintiffs seek an opportunity to oppose the motion to file a surreply or, in the alternative, to file a response to that surreply.

I consider plaintiffs' motion in the nature of a motion for reconsideration and deny it. The Court has ample information before it on the pending motion. If it believes further briefing is necessary, the parties will be so advised. If argument is scheduled, either side can request leave to file post-argument briefs.

CONCLUSION

Plaintiffs' response (Dkt. #170), which I treat as a motion for reconsideration, is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20091030

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.