UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
October 30, 2009
TAMMY BRICKEY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
DOLGENCORP, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: David G. Larimer United States District Judge
DECISION AND ORDER
Defendants moved for leave to file a surreply concerning a pending motion (Dkt. #168). After due consideration, the Court granted the motion (Dkt. #169). By letter dated October 28, 2009, filed that same day (Dkt. #170), plaintiffs seek an opportunity to oppose the motion to file a surreply or, in the alternative, to file a response to that surreply.
I consider plaintiffs' motion in the nature of a motion for reconsideration and deny it. The Court has ample information before it on the pending motion. If it believes further briefing is necessary, the parties will be so advised. If argument is scheduled, either side can request leave to file post-argument briefs.
Plaintiffs' response (Dkt. #170), which I treat as a motion for reconsideration, is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.