Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dubois v. Bezio

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department


November 5, 2009

IN THE MATTER OF DONALD DUBOIS, PETITIONER,
v.
NORMAN R. BEZIO, AS DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL HOUSING AND INMATE DISCIPLINARY PROGRAMS, RESPONDENT.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Calendar Date: September 30, 2009

Before: Cardona, P.J., Rose, Lahtinen, McCarthy and Garry, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

During a search of petitioner's cell, correction officials recovered 40 individual packets of a brownish substance that tested positive for heroin secreted in bags of rice located under petitioner's bed. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing a narcotic drug as well as contraband. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charges. The determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal with a modified penalty and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, testimony of the correction officer who authored it and documentary evidence provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Dozier v Selsky, 54 AD3d 1074, 1075 [2008]; Matter of Diaz v Goord, 26 AD3d 561, 562 [2006]). There is no merit to petitioner's claim that the assigned Hearing Officer should not have presided over the hearing. Although the Hearing Officer knew about the search, there is no evidence establishing either that he witnessed the incident or that he investigated the same (see Matter of Sime v Goord, 30 AD3d 887, 888 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 717 [2006]). Petitioner's remaining contentions have either not been preserved for our review or are lacking in merit.

Cardona, P.J., Rose, Lahtinen, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

20091105

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.