NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
December 1, 2009
MARIE YVA JEAN-LOUIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered September 25, 2008, which granted defendants' motion to dismiss the second cause of action of the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
The court properly dismissed the second cause of action wherein plaintiff alleges that defendants negligently trained, managed and/or supervised employees who confined her to an office for an hour and did not allow a union representative to be present while discussing her complaint that her supervisor inequitably distributed work based on her ethnicity and religious beliefs. This claim is barred by the exclusive remedy provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law (see Workers' Compensation Law § 11; § 29; Burlew v American Mut. Ins. Co., 63 NY2d 412, 416 ), and contrary to plaintiff's contention, the cause of action did not allege facts sufficient to invoke the intentional tort exception to the Workers' Compensation Law. Even if the alleged conduct could be reasonably construed to be in furtherance of defendants' interest, "[t]he complaint...did not contain requisite allegations that [defendants] had knowledge of, or acquiesced in, the tortious conduct of [their employees]" (Velasquez-Spillers v Infinity Broadcasting Corp., 51 AD3d 427, 428 ).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.