NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
December 15, 2009
HARRIET BEIZER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
JOHN M. IOANNOU, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered February 27, 2009, which, in an action for treble damages under New York City Civil Court Act § 1812 based on seven Small Claims default judgments in favor of plaintiff and against defendants, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and, sua sponte, dismissed the complaint with leave to commence a new action for the same relief in Civil Court, unanimously modified, on the law, to vacate the dismissal and reinstate the complaint, the matter transferred to Civil Court, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Freedman, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
While actions under CCA 1812 should be brought in Civil Court where, as here, each of the constituent Small Claims judgments is for less than $25,000 inclusive of interest, costs and disbursements, and thus within Civil Court's monetary jurisdiction (see CCA § 211), it does not follow that if such an action is brought in Supreme Court it should be dismissed. Rather the availability of complete relief in Civil Court warrants a transfer of the action to that court (see 91st St. Co. v Robinson, 242 AD2d 502 ; see also NY Const art VI, §§ 7[b], 19[a]). Like Supreme Court, we have not considered the merits of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.