SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
December 22, 2009
THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT,
MATTHEW DELPESCE, APPELLANT.
Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J.), rendered February 17, 2009, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon a finding that he had violated conditions thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment and post-release supervision upon his previous conviction of attempted burglary in the second degree.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, ARIEL E. BELEN & CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, JJ.
(Ind. No. 348/07)
DECISION & ORDER
ORDERED that the amended judgment is affirmed.
Since "the defendant admitted to the violation[s] of probation with a full understanding that he would receive the term of imprisonment actually imposed at the time of resentencing, . . . he has no basis now to complain that his re-sentence was excessive" (People v Grzywaczewski, 61 AD3d 699, 700; see People v Trias, 50 AD3d 828, 828-829). In any event, the resentence was not excessive (see People v Hobson, 43 AD3d 1179, 1180; People v Costanza, 36 AD3d 829, 830; People v Arogundy, 112 AD2d 1003, 1004; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, BELEN and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.