Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

People v. Cole

NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT


December 30, 2009

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v.
AHMIR COLE, APPELLANT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D'Amico, J.), rendered November 8, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon two jury verdicts, of murder in the first degree (two counts), attempted robbery in the first degree, robbery in the first degree (four counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (three counts), attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and assault in the first degree.

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

As corrected through Wednesday, February 10, 2010

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon two verdicts, following two jury trials, of various crimes that include two counts of murder in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.27 [1] [a] [vii]; [b]), occurring at Tony's Ranch House, and one count of attempted murder in the second degree (§§ 110.00, 125.25 [1]), occurring at the Groove Nightclub. He also was convicted of, inter alia, four counts of robbery in the first degree (§ 160.15 [1], [2]), three counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (§ 265.03 [former (2)]) and one count each of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (§ 265.02 [former (4)]), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (§ 220.03), and attempted robbery in the first degree (§§ 110.00, 160.15 [2]).

Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]), we reject defendant's contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence with respect to the two counts of murder at Tony's Ranch House and the count of attempted murder at the Groove Nightclub, and with respect to the crimes relating to the incident at the Kenmore Store (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). We further conclude that the evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction with respect to the Kenmore Store crimes (see generally id.). The admissions of defendant to his girlfriend concerning his involvement in the Kenmore Store crimes corroborated the testimony of defendant's accomplice (see CPL 60.22 [1]; People v Pierce, 303 AD2d 966 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 565 [2003]).

Contrary to the further contention of defendant, we conclude that County Court properly denied his motion seeking to sever the drug possession count from the count of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, inasmuch as the cocaine and gun possession were part of the same criminal transaction at the time of defendant's arrest on May 29, 2006 (see CPL 200.20 [2] [a]). In addition, based on the evidence that the same weapon was used in the incidents at Tony's Ranch House and the Groove Nightclub, we conclude that the "chain of joinder" was then properly extended to the robbery, murder and attempted murder counts arising out of those incidents (CPL 200.20 [2] [d]). With respect to the conviction of two counts of murder in the first degree, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that the conviction is not supported by legally sufficient evidence inasmuch as the People did not offer proof of his age (see People v Kleinhans, 236 AD2d 790, 791 [1997], lv denied 89 NY2d 1096 [1997]; see generally People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). Defendant failed to move for a trial order of dismissal with respect to those counts that was " 'specifically directed' at the alleged error" (Gray, 86 NY2d at 19).

We have considered the remaining contentions in defendant's pro se supplemental brief, and we conclude that they are either unpreserved or without merit.

Present---Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Smith and Carni, JJ.

20091230

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.