Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Davis

December 30, 2009

IN THE MATTER OF JAMES P. DAVIS, AN ATTORNEY, RESPONDENT. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, PETITIONER.


Per curiam.

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

As corrected through Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Fourth Department, December 30, 2009

{**71 AD3d at 69}

OPINION OF THE COURT

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on February 22, 1985, and maintains an office for the practice of law in Buffalo. The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with acts of misconduct that included conversion of client funds. Respondent filed an answer admitting the material allegations of the petition, and he appeared before this Court and submitted matters in mitigation.

Respondent admits that he failed to maintain the funds of a client and used the funds for payment of personal expenses. He also admits that he deposited into his attorney trust account checks made payable to him for legal fees, thereby commingling client funds with personal funds, made cash withdrawals from the account and issued checks drawn against the account made payable to cash rather than to a named payee, and that he failed to maintain required records of client funds. Finally, respondent admits that he failed to respond promptly and completely to requests for information from the Grievance Committee during its investigation.

We conclude that respondent has violated the following Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility:

DR 1-102 (a) (4) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [4])--engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation;

DR 1-102 (a) (5) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [5])--engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;

DR 1-102 (a) (7) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [7])--engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer;

DR 9-102 (a) (22 NYCRR 1200.46 [a])--misappropriating client funds and commingling client funds with personal funds;

DR 9-102 (b) (1) (22 NYCRR 1200.46 [b] [1])--failing to maintain client funds in a special account separate from his ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.