SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
January 19, 2010
IN THE MATTER OF SCOTT F. SANDS, PETITIONER,
RICHARD F. DAINES, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
JOSEPH COVELLO, J.P., DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, RUTH C. BALKIN and SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.
(Index No. 26968/07)
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health dated September 7, 2007, which, after a fair hearing, confirmed a determination of the New York City Department of Social Services dated December 21, 2006, discontinuing the petitioner's medical assistance benefits.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
"Judicial review of an administrative determination made after a hearing required by law, and at which evidence was taken, is limited to whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Mill Riv. Club, Inc. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 59 AD3d 549, 553; see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180; Matter of Lieberman v City of New York, 52 AD3d 719; Matter of Scara-Mix, Inc. v Martinez, 305 AD2d 418). Substantial evidence "means such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact" (300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d at 180; see Matter of Bush v Mulligan, 57 AD3d 772, 775).
Here, the determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health (hereinafter the Commissioner) to discontinue the petitioner's medical assistance benefits on the ground that he is not a resident of the State of New York is supported by substantial evidence in the record, which includes proof that the petitioner has lived continuously in the State of Florida since 1989, never having returned to New York due to his medical condition. In addition, the Florida home in which the petitioner lives is owned by the petitioner and his mother as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. Moreover, the petitioner has received an annual tax exemption for the property "for totally and permanently disabled persons" pursuant to Fla Stat § 196.101, which requires the recipient of the exemption to be a permanent resident of Florida (see Fla Stat § 196.101[a]).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
COVELLO, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, BALKIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.