Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Santiago v. New York City Transit Authority

NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT


January 28, 2010

NEREIDA SANTIAGO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edgar G. Walker, J.), entered June 13, 2008, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Freedman, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

16621/05

Plaintiff, who was injured when she stumbled upon boarding a bus, claims that the bus operator was negligent in failing to lower the bus platform for her. The record establishes, however, that, before boarding, plaintiff (then 57 years old) did not ask the operator to lower the platform, and that she did not appear unable to negotiate the height differential between the curb and the bus platform. Under these circumstances, there was no duty to lower the platform (see Trainer v City of New York, 41 AD3d 202 [2007] [where disembarking 77-year-old passenger neither "request(ed) that the bus be lowered" nor "appeared incapable of negotiating the distance" between the bus and the street, "there was no duty to lower the (bus's) steps"]; see also Sabella v City of New York, 58 AD3d 712 [2009]; Carlino v Triboro Coach Corp., 22 AD3d 624 [2005]). In view of the foregoing, any discrepancy between plaintiff's testimony and that of the bus operator concerning the height differential between the curb and the platform is immaterial.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

20100128

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.