Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Maisonette v. New York City Housing Authority

February 2, 2010

ALEXIS MAISONETTE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT,
HI-TECH MECHANICAL, DEFENDANT.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered April 20, 2004, which denied plaintiff's motion to restore the action to the trial calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Catterson, J.P., Acosta, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

6072/93

Apart from the preclusive effect of the never-vacated prior order denying a prior motion to restore by plaintiff when neither side appeared to argue the motion (CPLR 5015), plaintiff fails to explain his utter lack of diligence in prosecuting the action or show a meritorious cause of action beyond the conclusory allegations in his notice of claim (CPLR 3404; see Muriel v St. Barnabas Hosp., 3 AD3d 419, 420 [2004]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

20100202

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.