SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
February 9, 2010
THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT,
CESAR SALGADO, APPELLANT.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Erlbaum, J.), rendered June 5, 2007, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., THOMAS A. DICKERSON, CHERYL E. CHAMBERS & L. PRISCILLA HALL, JJ.
(Ind. No. 1328/06)
DECISION & ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The nature and extent of cross-examination is subject to the sound discretion of the Trial Judge (see People v Schwartzman, 24 NY2d 241, 244, cert denied 396 US 846). Here, contrary to the defendant's contention, defense counsel's cross-examination of the complainant was not improperly curtailed or restricted (see People v Macuil, 67 AD3d 1025; People v Martin, 33 AD3d 1024).
Moreover, the Supreme Court properly precluded the defendant from displaying certain scarring on his legs to the jury (see generally People v Aska, 91 NY2d 979, 981; People v Bowen, 67 AD3d 1022; People v Martin, 27 AD3d 665).
RIVERA, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and HALL, JJ., concur.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.