Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), rendered May 2, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts) and reckless endangerment in the first degree.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, March 31, 2010
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [former (2)]). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349 ), and according great deference to the jury's resolution of credibility issues, we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 ). The record does not support defendant's contention that evidentiary rulings by County Court during the cross-examination by defendant of certain prosecution witnesses impaired his ability to present a defense (see People v Martin, 33 AD3d 1024 , lv denied 8 NY3d 882 ; see also People v Macuil, 67 AD3d 1025 ). Contrary to defendant's further contention, the prosecutor did not improperly vouch for the credibility of a witness during his summation but, rather, his statements were fair comment on the credibility of that witness, in response to the defense counsel's summation (see People v Lazzaro, 62 AD3d 1035 ; People v Williams, 52 AD3d 851 , lv denied 11 NY3d 836 ).
Present---Smith, J.P., Centra, Fahey, Green and Pine, JJ.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...