Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tuff v. Oneida County

February 16, 2010

NATHANIAL TUFF, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ONEIDA COUNTY; AND LT. LIDDY, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: David N. Hurd United States District Judge

DECISION and ORDER

Plaintiff, Nathanial Tuff, commenced this civil rights action in February 2009, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Report-Recommendation dated January 15, 2010, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 8) be granted and that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed by any party.

Based upon a careful review of the file, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety, with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk shall file judgment accordingly and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100216

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.