NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
February 18, 2010
DULJO BOGDANOVIC, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT, NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered November 10, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from, as limited by the briefs, awarded plaintiff $250,000 for future lost earnings, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Andrias, J.P., Catterson, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
We see no reason to reduce the damages awarded to plaintiff for future earnings for a period of 20 years, where the medical evidence established that plaintiff would only be able to work part-time as a result of his injuries, and where the damages awarded by the jury were less than half the sum projected in uncontradicted testimony by plaintiff's economist (cf. Flores v Parkchester Preserv. Co., L.P., 42 AD3d 318 , lv denied, 10 NY3d 714 ).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.