Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Finkel v. A.B. Recycling

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


March 2, 2010

FRANK H. FINKEL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
A.B. RECYCLING, LLC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lindsay, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the court is the plaintiff's motion requesting a telephone conference with the court for the purpose of setting the parties' deposition schedule. That request is denied. Although, counsel has advised the court that the original deposition schedule was the result of "extensive scheduling negotiations, the parties should have been able to resolve this issue without court intervention. The trustees are correct that the discovery by one party is not a basis for any other party to delay its discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d)(2)(B). Accordingly, the parties shall go forward with the March 4th and 5th depositions and shall meet and confer to schedule the continued deposition of Andrew Rombough.

SO ORDERED

ARLENE ROSARIO LINDSAY United States Magistrate Judge

20100302

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.