Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered January 30, 2007, convicting him of rape in the first degree and burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., MARK C. DILLON, RANDALL T. ENG and SHERI S. ROMAN, JJ.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the admission of People's Exhibit Nos. 6 and 7 deprived him of a fair trial (see CPL 470.05). In any event, insofar as both exhibits summarized information from various DNA reports, they were properly admitted under the voluminous writing exception to the best evidence rule (see Ed Guth Realty v Gingold, 34 NY2d 440; Sager Spuck Statewide Supply Co. v Meyer, 298 AD2d 794; People v Potter, 255 AD2d 763; People v Weinberg, 183 AD2d 932). Furthermore, we note that before trial, the defendant was provided with copies of all the DNA reports (see Ed Guth Realty v Gingold, 34 NY2d 440; Sager Spuck Statewide Supply Co. v Meyer, 298 AD2d 794; People v Potter, 255 AD2d 763; People v Weinberg, 183 AD2d 932).
PRUDENTI, P.J., DILLON, ENG and ROMAN, JJ., concur.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...