UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
March 5, 2010
TELEBRANDS CORP., PLAINTIFF,
HM IMPORT USA CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Roanne L. Mann, United States Magistrate Judge
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Even after the Court issued its Memorandum and Order on March 3, 2010, D.E. #48, denying plaintiff's request for a compulsion order, the parties continued to file papers as if the Court had not yet ruled on the matter. See Letter in Response to Defendants' Opposition ("Pl. 3/3/10 Letter"), D.E. #49; [Defendants'] Reply in Opposition, D.E. #50; Affidavit/Declaration [sic] in Opposition re Motion to Compel Discovery, D.E. #51. Henceforth, counsel should check their ECF bounces before making their submissions.
Treating plaintiff's latest submission as a motionfor reconsideration, the Court declines to disturb its ruling of March 3rd. Plaintiff's unadorned assertion "that Defendants intend to render themselves judgment proof and to flee the country," Pl. 3/3/10 Letter at 2, does not warrant an order compelling the post-judgment discovery that plaintiff seeks. Again, any request for an order of attachment should be addressed to the District Court.
ROANNE L. MANN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.