Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Telebrands Corp. v. HM Import USA Corp.

March 5, 2010

TELEBRANDS CORP., PLAINTIFF,
v.
HM IMPORT USA CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Roanne L. Mann, United States Magistrate Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Even after the Court issued its Memorandum and Order on March 3, 2010, D.E. #48, denying plaintiff's request for a compulsion order, the parties continued to file papers as if the Court had not yet ruled on the matter. See Letter in Response to Defendants' Opposition ("Pl. 3/3/10 Letter"), D.E. #49; [Defendants'] Reply in Opposition, D.E. #50; Affidavit/Declaration [sic] in Opposition re Motion to Compel Discovery, D.E. #51. Henceforth, counsel should check their ECF bounces before making their submissions.

Treating plaintiff's latest submission as a motionfor reconsideration, the Court declines to disturb its ruling of March 3rd. Plaintiff's unadorned assertion "that Defendants intend to render themselves judgment proof and to flee the country," Pl. 3/3/10 Letter at 2, does not warrant an order compelling the post-judgment discovery that plaintiff seeks. Again, any request for an order of attachment should be addressed to the District Court.

SO ORDERED.

ROANNE L. MANN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20100305

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.