Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gwynn v. Soriano

NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT


March 25, 2010

NATHAN GWYNN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
VICTOR SORIANO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS,
DENNIS SULLIVAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered November 12, 2009, which, to the extent appealed from, upon reargument, denied the motion of defendants Victor Soriano, Hector F. Mota, and Felix Tejeda for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed against all defendants. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sweeny, Nardelli, Renwick, JJ.

18619/04

In opposition to defendants' prima facie showing that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d), plaintiff proffered neither objective medical evidence of significant limitations in his knee that were caused by the accident (see Jean v Kabaya, 63 AD3d 509 [2009]) nor competent medical proof substantiating his 90/180-day claim (see Nguyen v Abdel-Hamed, 61 AD3d 429 [2009]).

In view of the foregoing, the complaint should be dismissed against all defendants (see Lopez v Simpson, 39 AD3d 420 [2007]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

20100325

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.