In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pines, J.), dated January 7, 2008, and the plaintiff cross-appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from stated portions of the same order.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., RUTH C. BALKIN, JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.
ORDERED that the appeal and cross appeal are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The appeal and cross appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal and cross appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal and cross appeal from the judgment (see Gorey v Allion Healthcare, Inc.,AD3d [Appellate Division Docket No. 2008-09537; decided herewith]; CPLR 5501[a]).
PRUDENTI, P.J., BALKIN, LEVENTHAL and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...