Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Thomas v. Cassleberry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


April 13, 2010

VICTOR KEVEN THOMAS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
C.O. J. CASSLEBERRY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: David G. Larimer United States District Judge

DECISION AND ORDER

Plaintiff, Victor Thomas, moved to amend his complaint, principally to add six new defendants. (Dkt. #56, #61). Defendants' opposed the motions (Dkt. #64).

This Court had referred pretrial matters in this case to United States Magistrate Judge Marian W. Payson pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). After considering the relevant papers, Magistrate Judge Payson issued a thorough Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #78), which discussed the facts and the legal principles involved. It was Magistrate Judge Payson's recommendation that the Court should deny the motions. Plaintiff has filed objections to that Report and Recommendation.

After careful review of all the pleadings, as well as Magistrate Judge Payson's Report and Recommendation, I agree with her analysis of the facts and the law. I see no reason to modify, reverse or change the Report and Recommendation and, therefore, I adopt it in its entirety.

CONCLUSION

Plaintiff's motions to amend the complaint (Dkt. #56, #61) are in all respects denied. IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100413

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.