Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Caraway

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


April 14, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
NORMAN S. CARAWAY, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Richard J. Arcara United States District Judge

ORDER

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). On July 22, 2009, defendant filed a motion to dismiss the indictment. On January 14, 2010, Magistrate Judge Schroeder filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendant's motion to dismiss be denied.

Defendant filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on January 27, 20910 and on February 8, 2010, and the government filed a response thereto on February 22, 2010. Oral argument on the objections was held on April 12, 2010. At oral argument, defendant cited Arizona v. Gant, 129 S.Ct. 1710 (2009), a case that does not address inventory searches, but rather searches incident to a lawful arrest. In contrast, "[i]t is well recognized in Supreme Court precedent that, when law enforcement officials take a vehicle into custody, they may search the vehicle and make an inventory of its contents without need for a search warrant and without regard to whether there is probable cause to suspect that the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of criminal conduct." U.S. v. Lopez, 547 F.3d 364, 369 (2d Cir. 2008) (citations omitted).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. Upon a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, and after reviewing the submissions and hearing argument from the parties, the Court adopts the proposed findings of the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Schroeder's Report and Recommendation, defendant's motion to dismiss is denied.

The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Schroeder for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.

20100414

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.