NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
April 22, 2010
ANGELINA BISOGNO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
333 TENANTS CORP. CO-OP, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered November 2, 2009, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, deemed an appeal from judgment, same court and Justice, entered December 23, 2009 (CPLR 5501[c]), and so considered, said judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Acosta, DeGrasse, Richter, JJ.
In opposition to defendants' prima facie showing that they did not create an unreasonably dangerous condition by placing a pile of Christmas trees near the curb on the sidewalk in front of their building, plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact whether defendants had notice of a tripping hazard that allegedly resulted when the trees were moved by an unknown person or persons some time between their placement on the sidewalk and plaintiff's fall later that morning (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836 ).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.