The opinion of the court was delivered by: Denise Cote, District Judge
This Opinion addresses a motion by interpleader-plaintiff BNP Paribas ("BNP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1335 and 2361 for discharge, injunctive relief, and attorneys' fees and costs. The interpleader-defendants do not oppose BNP's motion. The only dispute among the parties concerns the source from which the attorneys' fees and costs should be paid. For the following reasons, BNP's motion is granted, including its request that attorneys' fees and costs be paid from the stake.
The following is a summary of undisputed facts that are pertinent to the present motion. Additional background is set forth in the Opinion dated December 23, 2009. See BNP Paribas v. Wayzata Opportunities Fund II, L.P., No. 09 Civ. 5351 (DLC), 2009 WL 5061750 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2009) (the "December 2009 Opinion"). In a credit agreement dated January 31, 2006 (the "Credit Agreement"), certain financial institutions (the "Lenders") agreed to make loans to a company now known as Propex Fabrics, Inc. ("Propex"). BNP, in addition to being a Lender, is the administrative agent under the Credit Agreement. In that capacity, BNP is responsible for distributing proceeds from the sale of Propex's collateral and certain payments if an "Event of Default" occurs under the Credit Agreement.
On January 18, 2008, Propex filed for bankruptcy, which constituted an Event of Default under the Credit Agreement. On March 27, the bankruptcy court authorized Propex to sell substantially all of its assets. BNP, as administrative agent, held the proceeds from the sale. BNP made a pro rata share distribution of a portion of the proceeds to the Lenders in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement. Prior to making any distributions, however, BNP withheld a total of $1,183,500 to pay certain administrative costs expected to be incurred by BNP as administrative agent (the "Reserved Amount"). The Reserved Amount included $648,782.13, which amount is the subject of this interpleader action (the "Stake").*fn1
Under Section 10.2(ix) of the Credit Agreement, Propex agreed to pay the fees and expenses "incurred by Administrative Agent and Lenders in enforcing any Obligations" under the Credit Agreement. Pursuant to this provision, certain Lenders (the "Participating Lenders")*fn2 requested in a letter dated April 24, 2009, that BNP pay the fees and expenses incurred by them in connection with the filing of a conditional objection to the sale of Propex's assets in the bankruptcy court (the "Enforcement Fees and Expenses"). The Enforcement Fees and Expenses totaled $648,782.13. In a letter dated May 1, the Participating Lenders demanded that BNP distribute this amount, i.e., the Stake, to them. The same day, a representative of another Lender, Wayzata Opportunities Fund II, L.P. ("Wayzata"), communicated to BNP that Wayzata would initiate legal proceedings against BNP if it distributed the Stake to the Participating Lenders.
On June 9, BNP filed this interpleader action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1335, requesting that the Court resolve the distribution of the Stake. On June 17, BNP deposited the Stake with the Court's Registry and made no claim to the Stake. All of the named interpleader-defendants were served with the complaint. On September 18, the Participating Lenders filed a motion for summary judgment seeking an order instructing BNP to distribute the Stake to them. Wayzata filed an opposition on October 9 in which it argued, inter alia, that section 10.2(ix) of the Credit Agreement did not authorize payment of the Enforcement Fees and Expenses sought by the Participating Lenders. Instead, Wayzata sought a pro rata distribution of the Stake to all Lenders. The December 2009 Opinion rejected Wayzata's interpretation of the Credit Agreement, granted the Participating Lenders' motion for summary judgment, and ordered that the Stake be returned to BNP for distribution to the Participating Lenders. See BNP Paribas, 2009 WL 5061750, at *6.
On March 1, 2010, BNP filed the instant motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1335 and 2361 for an order: (1) discharging BNP from all further liability with respect to the Stake; (2) permanently enjoining all further actions by the named interpleader defendants with regard to the Stake; and (3) awarding BNP attorneys' fees and costs of $29,580.82 incurred in bringing the interpleader action.*fn3 On March 19, the Participating Lenders filed their response. The Participating Lenders do not oppose BNP's motion, except insofar as it seeks payment of attorneys' fess and costs from the Stake. The Participating Lenders contend that BNP's attorneys' fees and costs should be paid from the Reserved Amount, or alternatively, by Wayzata. On April 2, BNP filed its reply and Wayzata filed a response. Like the Participating Lenders, Wayzata does not oppose BNP's motion. Wayzata objects, however, to the Participating Lenders' position that Wayzata should bear BNP's attorneys' fees and costs.
"Under 28 U.S.C. § 1335, a district court has jurisdiction of any civil action of interpleader involving money or property worth $500 or more where two or more adverse claimants, of diverse citizenship as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1332, are claiming or may claim to be entitled to such money or property, if the plaintiff has deposited the money or property with the court." N.Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Conn. Dev. Auth., 700 F.2d 91, 95 (2d Cir. 1983) (citation omitted). "In such an action, the court is to hear and determine the case, and may discharge the plaintiff from further liability, may enter a permanent injunction restraining the claimants from proceeding in any state or United States court in a suit to affect the property, and may make all appropriate orders to enforce its judgment." Id. (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2361);*fn4 see also Mendez v. TIAA-CREF, 982 F.2d 783, 787 (2d Cir. 1992). "Before discharging a stakeholder under § 2361, the court must first determine whether the requirements of [28 U.S.C. § 1335] have been met." Mendez, 982 F.2d at 787.
There is no dispute that the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1335 have been met and that BNP is entitled to the relief it seeks. BNP is a disinterested stakeholder and made no claim against the Stake.*fn5 The Stake, which is valued at more than $500, was deposited in the Court's Registry on June 17, 2009. Further, at least two competing claims were asserted against the Stake by claimants of diverse citizenship. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2361, BNP shall be discharged from all further liability with respect to the Stake, and a permanent injunction shall be entered enjoining all further actions by the named interpleader defendants with regard to the Stake.
2. Attorneys' Fees and Costs
"A disinterested stakeholder who asserts interpleader is entitled to be awarded costs and attorney's fees." Septembertide Pub., B.V. v. Stein and Day, Inc., 884 F.2d 675, 683 (2d Cir. 1989); see also A/S Krediit Pank v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 303 F.2d 648, 649 (2d Cir. 1962) (per curiam). Attorneys' fees and costs "are generally awarded against the interpleader fund, but may, in the discretion of the court, be taxed against one of the parties when their conduct justifies it." Septembertide, 884 F.2d at 683 (citing Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Boyd, 781 F.2d 1494, 1497-98 (11th Cir. 1986)); see also Globe Indem. Co. v. Puget Sound Co., 154 F.2d 249, 250 (2d Cir. 1946) ("[T]he plaintiff in interpleader is entitled to costs (usually including a reasonable attorney's fee) to be paid out of ...