UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 18, 2010
EMIL SZAFRAN, PLAINTIFF,
SANDATA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Seybert, District Judge
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Emil Szafan's motion for reconsideration of the Court's February 3, 2010 Memorandum and Order. That motion is DENIED. Plaintiff points to no "controlling decisions or data that the court overlooked" Dennis v. Dep't of Homeland Sec. Bureau of Immigration & Custom Enforcement, No. 09-CV-4513, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105621, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2009) (quoting Shrader v. CSX Tramp, Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995). Instead, Plaintiff principally reiterates the arguments he made prior to the Court's February 3 decision. These contentions are well-thought out and are certainly not frivolous. But the Court previously rejected them, in favor of Defendant's more persuasive positions. The Court sees no reason to change its mind now. Plaintiff is, of course, free to re-raise these arguments should this case reach the appellate level.
JOANNA SEYBERT, U.S.D.J.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.