Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

People v. Smith

NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT


May 25, 2010

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v.
ROBERT SMITH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J. at suppression hearing; Robert Straus, J. at plea and sentence), rendered January 19, 2007, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

5456/06

The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress a statement that defendant claimed to be the product of an unlawful detention. The police received an anonymous tip that included detailed clothing descriptions of a man and a woman at a specific location and stated that the man had just given the woman a handgun, which she placed in her purse. The police immediately arrived at that location and saw people running, including defendant and a woman, who met the descriptions of the man and woman referred to in the tip. After the police found a purse under a nearby parked car that contained the woman's photo identification and a handgun, they arrested defendant and the woman and took them to the station house. About nine hours later, the woman made a statement connecting defendant to the weapon. Shortly thereafter, defendant waived his Miranda rights and, after initially denying knowledge of the weapon, he admitted possessing it. Regardless of whether the police had probable cause to take defendant into custody, his statement was sufficiently attenuated from the taint of the unlawful arrest (see e.g. People v Divine, 21 AD3d 767 [2005], affd 6 NY3d 790 [2006]; People v Doyle, 295 AD2d 446, 447 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 730 [2002]; People v McCloud, 247 AD2d 409 [1998], lv denied 91 NY2d 975 [1998]). Defendant's confession was "sufficiently an act of free will to purge the primary taint" (Wong Sun v United States, 371 US 471, 486 [1963]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

20100525

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.