NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
May 25, 2010
JACQUELINE AGUILAR TAYLOR, ET AL., PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS,
NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, AMALGAMATED WARBASSE HOUSES, INC., RESPONDENT.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered April 25, 2008, to the extent appealed from, denying the petition to annul the determination of respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) which denied petitioner Taylor's application for succession rights to the deceased tenant's apartment, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered January 14, 2009, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as abandoned.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Petitioners failed to demonstrate that the subject apartment was petitioner Taylor's primary residence, since she was not listed on the deceased tenant's income affidavits and no notice of a change in family composition had been filed (see 9 NYCRR 1727-8.2[a]; 9 NYCRR 1700.2, formerly 9 NYCRR 1727-8.2[a]; Matter of Greichel v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 39 AD3d 421 ). Regardless of whether respondent Amalgamated Warbasse Houses, Inc. knew of and acquiesced to Taylor's residency in the apartment, DHCR cannot be estopped from invoking the regulations (Matter of Schorr v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev., 10 NY3d 776 ).
We have considered petitioners' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.