NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
June 3, 2010
ROBERT SULECKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS,
M.A. ANGELIADES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karen S. Smith, J.), entered February 2, 2009, which denied the municipal defendants' motion to amend their answer to assert the defenses of workers' compensation and collateral estoppel, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, leave to amend granted and the complaint dismissed as against the City of New York and the New York City Fire Department.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Freedman, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
Plaintiff, an engineer employed by the New York City Department of Design and Construction, was injured after tripping on a sidewalk adjoining a City-owned building while on his way to a work-related meeting. The Workers' Compensation Law provides the exclusive remedy where, as here, the employer and the landowner are essentially the same party and the plaintiff is injured while performing his job (see Billy v Consolidated Mach. Tool Corp., 51 NY2d 152, 158-159 ; Murray v City of New York, 43 NY2d 400 ; Paulino v Lifecare Transp., 57 AD3d 319 . No exception should be made simply because plaintiff's injury did not occur at the location of the work-related meeting. Accordingly, the motion for leave to amend the answer should have been granted and the complaint dismissed as against the municipal defendants.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.